Wednesday, June 5, 2013


Foreclosure victims will get $1,500 checks 

The money will go to about 207,000 
Californian homeowners who claimed they were subject to wrongful foreclosures
  ASSOCIATED PRESS
     SACRAMENTO — More than 200,000 Californians will each receive checks worth nearly $1,500 this month as part of the national mortgage settlement, the state attorney general’s office said Tuesday.
   The money is going to homeowners who successfully filed claims saying they were the victims of wrongful foreclosures.
   Attorney general spokesman Nick Pacilio said that the national settlement administrator, Rust Consulting, will mail checks of about $1,480 starting next week to about 207,000 Californians who lost their homes.
   That amounts to more than $307 million in settlement money statewide, and is part of the $1.5 billion in settlement checks that will be sent to nearly 1 million borrowers nationwide.  
   Those who were eligible for the checks had their mortgage serviced by one of the settlement’s five major banks and lost their homes to foreclosure between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011. The five participating banks are Ally Financial Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Wells Fargo & Co.
   The borrowers filed claims that they were the victims of misconduct by the lenders in the servicing of their mortgages. That pri-     marily involved complaints that lenders lost their refinancing applications or that the borrowers were victims of what are known as “dualtrack foreclosures,” a practice that is now illegal in California where lenders filed notices of default while they   also considered alternatives to foreclosures.
   The money is part of the $42 billion national settlement, which is projected to bring more than $20 billion in relief or compensation to California. The bulk of the money will be in the form of loan modifications and refinancing of mortgages, Pacilio said.

GUSTAVO REYES ET AL vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, CASE No. 3:10-cv-01667-JCS


NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND CLAIM PROCESS

 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation fi·om a lawyer.

YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST WELLS FARGO BANK BECAUSE ITS RECORDS INDICATE YOU WERE SENT A SPECIAL FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT OFFER PERTAINING TO YOUR MORTGAGE. IF YOU MADE THE TRIAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED UNDER THE SPECIAL FORBEARANCE
AGREEMENT, BUT DID NOT RECEIVE A MORTGAGE LOAN MODIFICATION AT
THE END OF THE FORBEARANCE PERIOD, THEN THIS SETTLEMENT AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS AND YOU MAY MAKE A CLAIM TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT FUND OR EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT.

TO MAKE A CLAIM, YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE ENCLOSED CLAIM
FORM POSTMARKED BY NO LATER THAN JULY 19, 2013.

IF YOU WISH TO EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM (OPT OUT OF) THE SETTLEMENT, YOU MUST ACT TO DO SO IN WRITING BY JULY 19, 2013.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on the fairness of the proposed settlement (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on Friday, October 11, 2013, at 1:30 P.M. at the United States District Court, Northern District Of California San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom G - 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, to consider and determine whether (a) the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be finally approved ; (b) the application for an award of attorney fees and expenses to Class Counsel should be approved; (c) the application for a service award to the representative plaintiff should be approved; and (d) any other final matters pe1iaining to this settlement. The Court may adjourn or continue the Settlement Hearing without fmiher notice.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Class Members who object to any aspect of the settlement or the applications for an award of attorney fees and expenses to Class Counsel or service award to the representative plaintiff have the right to be heard at the Settlement Hearing.  They may do so on their own, or hire attorneys to represent them at their own expense.  In order to appear and be heard , Class members or their attorneys must mail or otherwise deliver written notice


QUESTIONS? VISITWWW .NOTICECLA SS.COM/REYESSETTLEMENT

GUSTAVO REYES ET AL vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, CASE No. 3:10-cv-01667-JCS


demonstrating their membership in the Class and reasons for their objections by no later than September 13, 2013 to each of the following:

The Court
Class C
ounsel
Defense Counsel
United States District Court,
Northern District Of California
450 Golden Gate Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94102
Specifying: GUSTAVO RE YES
ET AL VS. WELLS FARGO
BANK, CASE NO. 3:10-CV- 01667-JCS
Thomas E. Loeser
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
LLP
1918 Eighth Ave, Ste 3300
Seattle, WA  98101
and
Peter B. Fredman
Law Office Of Peter Fredman 125 University Ave, Ste 102 Berkeley, CA 94710
Michael J Steiner
Severson & Werson
One Embarcadero Center,
Suite 2600
San Francisco , CA  94111

INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE AND SETTLEMENT

What Is This Case And Settlement About?
The class action lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs Gustavo Reyes and Maria Teresa Guerrero, husband
and wife, alleged that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage sent deceptive Special Forbearance Agreement offers to them and other California mortgage 

Friday, May 31, 2013


Community Reinvestment Act Information The Act (CRA)

The CRA was enacted in 1977 to prevent redlining and to encourage banks and thrifts to help meet the credit needs of all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.

 
Why I filed an OCC complaint against WELLS FARGO BANK

 Although auto dealers are exempt from certain biased lending rules, banks can’t apply racial policies to vehicle loans, as in my case, an AFRICAN AMERICAN who is now 75 years of age.  

COURTS and GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, are not concerned when AFRICAN AMERICANS are the VICTIMS.
This country’s HUMAN RIGHTS violations are worse than the Rights CHINA and other countries are accused of committing.
These conditions exist due to Federal, State agencies and banks the like of WELLS FARGO conspiring to violate Civil Rights laws and regulations. It is very difficult for an agency such as the FDIC/OCC to enforce regulations that they themselves do not believe in, and seldom enforce, unless the injured party is a White female as practiced under the so-called “Affirmative Action” legislation put in place and implemented to dilute Civil Rights legislation in order that White Females and White Males would be the beneficiaries.
Courts, Government and Law Enforcement Agencies fail to act when African Americans are THE VICTIMS,
see:   http://bankwhileblack.blogspot.com/
 Bank warned on loan bias on Page D1 of Friday, March 22, 2013 issue of The Press-Enterprise /